
Sang Truong
Stanford University
AACL-IJCNLP 2026
An introduction to measurement theory, statistical modeling, and incentive design for language model evaluation. We examine six common claims: what holds, where each breaks, and what the evidence supports.
For NLP researchers, students, and practitioners. Familiarity with benchmarks and basic probability is helpful; no background in psychometrics is required.

Stanford University

Harvard University

University of British Columbia

Stanford University
2025
EssentialOlawale Salaudeen, Anka Reuel, Ahmed Ahmed, et al. · arXiv preprint
A practical framework for deciding which claims and decisions an evaluation can support, using validity concepts from psychometrics.
@misc{salaudeen2025meaning,
title = {{Measurement to Meaning: A Validity-Centered Framework for AI Evaluation}},
author = {Salaudeen, Olawale and Reuel, Anka and Ahmed, Ahmed and Bedi, Suhana and Robertson, Zachary and Sundar, Sudharsan and Domingue, Ben and Wang, Angelina and Koyejo, Sanmi},
year = {2025},
howpublished = {arXiv preprint},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.10573}
}1955
Lee J. Cronbach and Paul E. Meehl · Psychological Bulletin
The foundational argument that interpreting a test requires a theory of the construct and evidence about its relationships to other observations.
@article{cronbach1955construct,
title = {{Construct Validity in Psychological Tests}},
author = {Cronbach, Lee J. and Meehl, Paul E.},
year = {1955},
journal = {Psychological Bulletin},
doi = {10.1037/h0040957},
url = {https://www.yorku.ca/~pclassic/Cronbach/construct.htm}
}1959
Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske · Psychological Bulletin
Introduces a way to distinguish agreement about a construct from agreement caused by shared measurement methods.
@article{campbell1959validation,
title = {{Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix}},
author = {Campbell, Donald T. and Fiske, Donald W.},
year = {1959},
journal = {Psychological Bulletin},
doi = {10.1037/h0046016},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016}
}2026
EssentialMeera Desai, Sang T. Truong, Hanna Wallach, et al. · COLM
Tests whether benchmarks sharing a conceptual label agree more strongly with one another than with benchmarks carrying different labels.
@inproceedings{desai2026benchmarks,
title = {{What AI Benchmarks Actually Measure: Adapting Convergent and Discriminant Validity to Interrogate Fifty-Six AI Benchmarks}},
author = {Desai, Meera and Truong, Sang T. and Wallach, Hanna and Chouldechova, Alex and Cooper, A. Feder and Garcia-Gathright, Jean and Ho, Daniel E. and Jacobs, Abigail Z. and Koyejo, Sanmi and Pangakis, Nicholas and Wang, Angelina},
year = {2026},
booktitle = {Conference on Language Modeling},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08812}
}2024
Richard Ren, Steven Basart, Adam Khoja, et al. · NeurIPS
Examines whether safety benchmarks distinguish safety improvements from changes in general model capability.
@inproceedings{ren2024safetywashing,
title = {{Safetywashing: Do AI Safety Benchmarks Actually Measure Safety Progress?}},
author = {Ren, Richard and Basart, Steven and Khoja, Adam and Gatti, Alice and Phan, Long and Yin, Xuwang and Mazeika, Mantas and Pan, Alexander and Mukobi, Gabriel and Kim, Ryan H. and Fitz, Stephen and Hendrycks, Dan},
year = {2024},
booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.21792}
}2026
Suhana Bedi, Hejie Cui, Miguel Fuentes, et al. · Nature Medicine
An example of evaluating a broad application area through a taxonomy of medical tasks rather than relying on a single exam score.
@article{bedi2026medhelm,
title = {{Holistic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Medical Tasks with MedHELM}},
author = {Bedi, Suhana and Cui, Hejie and Fuentes, Miguel and Unell, Alyssa and others},
year = {2026},
journal = {Nature Medicine},
doi = {10.1038/s41591-025-04151-2},
url = {https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-025-04151-2}
}2021
Su Lin Blodgett, Gilsinia Lopez, Alexandra Olteanu, Robert Sim, and Hanna Wallach · ACL-IJCNLP
A worked audit of how unclear constructs, sentence design, and scoring assumptions undermine stereotyping benchmarks.
@inproceedings{blodgett2021stereotyping,
title = {{Stereotyping Norwegian Salmon: An Inventory of Pitfalls in Fairness Benchmark Datasets}},
author = {Blodgett, Su Lin and Lopez, Gilsinia and Olteanu, Alexandra and Sim, Robert and Wallach, Hanna},
year = {2021},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers)},
doi = {10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.81},
url = {https://aclanthology.org/2021.acl-long.81/}
}2025
EssentialSang T. Truong, Yuheng Tu, Percy Liang, Bo Li, and Sanmi Koyejo · ICML
Uses item response theory, predicted question difficulty, and adaptive testing to make evaluation more informative under a limited budget.
@inproceedings{truong2025amortized,
title = {{Reliable and Efficient Amortized Model-based Evaluation}},
author = {Truong, Sang T. and Tu, Yuheng and Liang, Percy and Li, Bo and Koyejo, Sanmi},
year = {2025},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 42nd International Conference on Machine Learning},
url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v267/truong25c.html}
}2025
Sang Truong, Yuheng Tu, Michael Hardy, et al. · NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks
Treats unusual patterns in model responses as clues for finding defective benchmark items and improving the evaluation instrument.
@inproceedings{truong2025bugs,
title = {{Fantastic Bugs and Where to Find Them in AI Benchmarks}},
author = {Truong, Sang and Tu, Yuheng and Hardy, Michael and Reuel-Lamparth, Anka and Tang, Zeyu and Burapacheep, Jirayu and Perera, Jonathan and Uwakwe, Chibuike and Domingue, Benjamin and Haber, Nick and Koyejo, Sanmi},
year = {2025},
booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},
url = {https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2025/hash/5b44b99d012922011f0be1031a98c4f9-Abstract-Datasets_and_Benchmarks_Track.html}
}2023
Rylan Schaeffer, Brando Miranda, and Sanmi Koyejo · NeurIPS
Shows how the scoring rule can turn gradual changes in model behavior into apparent jumps in measured capability.
@inproceedings{schaeffer2023emergence,
title = {{Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?}},
author = {Schaeffer, Rylan and Miranda, Brando and Koyejo, Sanmi},
year = {2023},
booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.15004}
}2025
EssentialAabid Karim, Abdul Karim, Bhoomika Lohana, Matt Keon, Jaswinder Singh, and Abdul Sattar · arXiv preprint · revised 2026
Changes cultural details in math problems while preserving their numerical content, probing whether familiar context affects measured reasoning performance.
@misc{karim2025translation,
title = {{Lost in Cultural Translation: Do LLMs Struggle with Math Across Cultural Contexts?}},
author = {Karim, Aabid and Karim, Abdul and Lohana, Bhoomika and Keon, Matt and Singh, Jaswinder and Sattar, Abdul},
year = {2025},
howpublished = {arXiv preprint · revised 2026},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.18018}
}2025
EssentialShivalika Singh, Angelika Romanou, Clémentine Fourrier, et al. · ACL
Separates cultural sensitivity from translation quality and examines how the choice of questions affects multilingual model comparisons.
@inproceedings{singh2025globalmmlu,
title = {{Global MMLU: Understanding and Addressing Cultural and Linguistic Biases in Multilingual Evaluation}},
author = {Singh, Shivalika and Romanou, Angelika and Fourrier, Clémentine and Adelani, David Ifeoluwa and others},
year = {2025},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)},
doi = {10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.919},
url = {https://aclanthology.org/2025.acl-long.919/}
}2024
Sang T. Truong, Duc Quang Nguyen, Toan Q. Nguyen, et al. · Findings of NAACL
A case study in building and evaluating Vietnamese language models across multiple tasks and evaluation criteria.
@inproceedings{truong2024vietnamese,
title = {{Crossing Linguistic Horizons: Finetuning and Comprehensive Evaluation of Vietnamese Large Language Models}},
author = {Truong, Sang T. and Nguyen, Duc Quang and Nguyen, Toan Q. and Le, Dong D. and Truong, Nhi N. and Quan, Tho and Koyejo, Sanmi},
year = {2024},
booktitle = {Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL 2024},
doi = {10.18653/v1/2024.findings-naacl.182},
url = {https://aclanthology.org/2024.findings-naacl.182/}
}2026
Max Zhang, Ameen Patel, Sang T. Truong, and Sanmi Koyejo · COLM
Uses multigroup item response theory to separate model safety, prompt difficulty, and language-specific effects in multilingual safety evaluation.
@inproceedings{zhang2026guardrails,
title = {{Why Do Safety Guardrails Degrade Across Languages?}},
author = {Zhang, Max and Patel, Ameen and Truong, Sang T. and Koyejo, Sanmi},
year = {2026},
booktitle = {Conference on Language Modeling},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.17173}
}2026
EssentialParker Whitfill, Cheryl Wu, Joel Becker, and Nate Rush · METR research note
Compares automated grading with maintainer acceptance of coding-agent patches. Agents could not iterate on feedback, so this is a test of score interpretation.
@misc{metr2026maintainers,
title = {{Many SWE-bench-Passing PRs Would Not Be Merged into Main}},
author = {Whitfill, Parker and Wu, Cheryl and Becker, Joel and Rush, Nate},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {METR research note},
url = {https://metr.org/notes/2026-03-10-many-swe-bench-passing-prs-would-not-be-merged-into-main/}
}2019
Benjamin Recht, Rebecca Roelofs, Ludwig Schmidt, and Vaishaal Shankar · ICML
Recreates an image-classification test set to examine which aspects of reported performance survive a change in the evaluation sample.
@inproceedings{recht2019imagenet,
title = {{Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?}},
author = {Recht, Benjamin and Roelofs, Rebecca and Schmidt, Ludwig and Shankar, Vaishaal},
year = {2019},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning},
url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/recht19a.html}
}2024
Olawale Salaudeen and Moritz Hardt · arXiv preprint · revised 2025
Provides a counterpoint to transfer failures: relative progress between image-classification architectures can persist on a deliberately different dataset.
@misc{salaudeen2024imagenot,
title = {{ImageNot: A Contrast with ImageNet Preserves Model Rankings}},
author = {Salaudeen, Olawale and Hardt, Moritz},
year = {2024},
howpublished = {arXiv preprint · revised 2025},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02112}
}2025
EssentialShivalika Singh, Yiyang Nan, Alex Wang, et al. · NeurIPS Datasets and Benchmarks
Analyzes how submission access, private testing, and selective disclosure can affect leaderboard comparisons; useful for examining evaluation policy alongside scores.
@inproceedings{singh2025leaderboard,
title = {{The Leaderboard Illusion}},
author = {Singh, Shivalika and Nan, Yiyang and Wang, Alex and Dsouza, Daniel and Kapoor, Sayash and Üstün, Ahmet and Koyejo, Sanmi and Deng, Yuntian and Longpre, Shayne and Smith, Noah and Ermis, Beyza and Fadaee, Marzieh and Hooker, Sara},
year = {2025},
booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},
url = {https://papers.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2025/hash/70a93f260a51123b3c0e33ecd1b4de97-Abstract-Datasets_and_Benchmarks_Track.html}
}2024
Minhao Jiang, Ken Ziyu Liu, Ming Zhong, et al. · arXiv preprint
Controlled pretraining experiments distinguish exposure to test inputs from exposure to answers and investigate the effects of repeated contamination.
@misc{jiang2024contamination,
title = {{Investigating Data Contamination for Pre-training Language Models}},
author = {Jiang, Minhao and Liu, Ken Ziyu and Zhong, Ming and Schaeffer, Rylan and Ouyang, Siru and Han, Jiawei and Koyejo, Sanmi},
year = {2024},
howpublished = {arXiv preprint},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06059}
}2025
Rylan Schaeffer, Ken Ziyu Liu, Brando Miranda, et al. · NeurIPS LLM Evaluation Workshop
Explains why leakage can have different effects across training regimes by considering model capacity and the incentive to memorize test data.
@inproceedings{schaeffer2025paradox,
title = {{The Contamination Paradox: Why Test Set Leakage Can Be Both Potent and Negligible}},
author = {Schaeffer, Rylan and Liu, Ken Ziyu and Miranda, Brando and Ahmed, Ahmed and Mireshghallah, Niloofar and Koyejo, Sanmi},
year = {2025},
booktitle = {NeurIPS Workshop on Evaluating the Evolving LLM Lifecycle},
url = {https://openreview.net/forum?id=Ajr8YtfhVO}
}2026
Rylan Schaeffer, Joshua Kazdan, Baber Abbasi, et al. · arXiv preprint
Studies contamination across pretraining, further training, and inference to identify conditions that amplify or reduce its effect on generative evaluations.
@misc{schaeffer2026contamination,
title = {{Quantifying the Effect of Test Set Contamination on Generative Evaluations}},
author = {Schaeffer, Rylan and Kazdan, Joshua and Abbasi, Baber and Liu, Ken Ziyu and Miranda, Brando and Ahmed, Ahmed and Berez, Fazl and Puri, Abhay and Biderman, Stella and Mireshghallah, Niloofar and Koyejo, Sanmi},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {arXiv preprint},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.04301}
}2026
Mubashara Akhtar, Anka Reuel, Prajna Soni, et al. · ICML
Studies when benchmarks stop distinguishing model performance and which design choices are associated with a longer useful evaluation life.
@inproceedings{akhtar2026plateau,
title = {{When AI Benchmarks Plateau: A Systematic Study of Benchmark Saturation}},
author = {Akhtar, Mubashara and Reuel, Anka and Soni, Prajna and Ahuja, Sanchit and others},
year = {2026},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 43rd International Conference on Machine Learning},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16763}
}2026
Sang Truong, Serena Wang, Nick Haber, and Sanmi Koyejo · Preprint
Models how randomized evaluation can encourage broader capability coverage, and how information leakage and updating the task set affect those incentives.
@misc{truong2026strategic,
title = {{Strategic Evaluation: Incentivizing AI Capability Coverage with Private Benchmarks}},
author = {Truong, Sang and Wang, Serena and Haber, Nick and Koyejo, Sanmi},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Preprint},
url = {https://aimslab.stanford.edu/papers/Truong2026StrategicEvaluation.pdf}
}2015
EssentialAvrim Blum and Moritz Hardt · ICML
A constructive response to adaptive overfitting: restrict how leaderboard feedback changes to preserve useful information across repeated submissions.
@inproceedings{blum2015ladder,
title = {{The Ladder: A Reliable Leaderboard for Machine Learning Competitions}},
author = {Blum, Avrim and Hardt, Moritz},
year = {2015},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning},
url = {https://proceedings.mlr.press/v37/blum15.html}
}2015
Cynthia Dwork, Vitaly Feldman, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi, Omer Reingold, and Aaron Roth · STOC
Develops guarantees for reusing data when later analyses depend on earlier results, a foundation for understanding feedback from private holdouts.
@inproceedings{dwork2015adaptive,
title = {{Preserving Statistical Validity in Adaptive Data Analysis}},
author = {Dwork, Cynthia and Feldman, Vitaly and Hardt, Moritz and Pitassi, Toniann and Reingold, Omer and Roth, Aaron},
year = {2015},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 47th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.2664}
}2019
Rebecca Roelofs, Vaishaal Shankar, Benjamin Recht, et al. · NeurIPS
An empirical counterpoint to worst-case adaptive-overfitting concerns, examining how public and private performance compare across machine-learning competitions.
@inproceedings{roelofs2019overfitting,
title = {{A Meta-Analysis of Overfitting in Machine Learning}},
author = {Roelofs, Rebecca and Shankar, Vaishaal and Recht, Benjamin and Fridovich-Keil, Sara and Hardt, Moritz and Miller, John and Schmidt, Ludwig},
year = {2019},
booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems},
url = {https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2019/hash/ee39e503b6bedf0c98c388b7e8589aca-Abstract.html}
}